This distraction is what truly “lowers a person’s frequency” and in fact, it is an activity which feeds those occult forces who relish in the narrow-bandwidth frequency of rumour-spreading, and are actively working through those people engaging in it. Gossip is a dualistic virus of petty small-mindedness, founded upon shadow projections in order to make oneself “feel good” (superior) by talking “bad” about another person based on nothing more than unfounded whispers, assumptions, lies, and accusations. There is a huge difference between engaging in gossip (i.e., “shit talking”, malicious rumours, and jealous innuendo), and exposing obvious abuse via the cult behavior/programming of self-proclaimed (pathological) teachers/gurus (based on many testimonials and data spanning over prolonged periods of time). In light of this topic and its wider implications, I’d like to address some points about judging, gossip, victim consciousness, shadow projection, making the darkness conscious, pathology, truth and lies, etc.: 1. It’s a form of spiritual bypassing – the worst kind of avoidance – because it not only feeds and fuels more abuse, but justifies it. These violations of human sovereignty are usually “swept under the rug” through the abuse (no pun intended) of spiritual “truths” and psychology. It’s the main reason why abuse (sexual, psychological, emotional, physical) in spiritual circles/communities keeps happing, and has been going on for decades – in the case of some “traditions”, for centuries. This behavior is a good example of being caught up in the group-think and cult-programming mentality, which they are obviously not aware of at all.
Many of the people who fall into the second category are oftentimes revealed to be very attached followers of said gurus/teachers (or are even part of their “inner circle”). Some have even literally stated that they won’t read the testimonials/article in question (motivated reasoning fallacy), and simply defend the guru/teacher in a reflexive manner. On the other hand, there are people who claim that it is not “spiritual” to “judge” these gurus/teachers, and that the men/women who have accused them are just coming from a place of victim consciousness, projecting their own stuff/wounds/shadow onto the person in question (or they are just engaging in “gossip”), going so far in this approach as to shame/insult the people (victim-blaming) who have stepped forward and shared their stories. On one hand, many people speak out and help to spread the word about these pathological individuals who have abused their power (usually exhibiting a history of abuse that’s been exposed via the many testimonials of brave individuals who chose to come forward). In light of a recent upsurge in revelations regarding predatory and abusive behavior exhibited by “spiritual” gurus/teachers around the world, I’ve witnessed two different reactions (generally speaking) to these ‘unmasking’ events. Claremont, CA: Hunter House.Spiritual Predators and Pathological Gurus The unconscious dimension in partner relationships. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71 (1), 37–57. Sense of entitlement in couple relationships: An attachment theory perspective. Fearful symmetry: The development and treatment of sadomasochism.
When love hurts: Treating abusive relationships.
New York: Harper Collins Publishers.įromm, E. The dynamics involved for men stuck in such dyads are considered, including the possible negative role of a systems approach to couples’ therapy that assumes mutual responsibility for the couples’ dysfunction and distress.Ĭarlson, J.
#He pathological fear of interaction with men free
Despite considerable awareness of how much they are damaged by their wives, they are either unwilling or unable to utilize separation and divorce as tools to protect themselves, with the ultimate goal of starting life again free of the persecutory other. This clinical paper examines two examples of male patients who, while accomplished in many spheres of their lives, are nevertheless engaged in marriages to women whose hateful behavior toward them is impossible to deny. While usually not involving physical abuse, the destructiveness of some women, expressed in terms of harsh and destructive verbal and interpersonal behavior can be so striking and persistent that it should remain of interest to psychoanalysts. Clinicians have focused more on the troubling issue of women who are dominated and abused by men than they have on those occasions where men are abused by women.
0 kommentar(er)
